#1
|
|||
|
|||
stinky pete
Is banned
I would like him not to be banned. 5 days seems bit much for a nice canadian boy. fact:I am not currently able to understand the concept of being banned. Either way. 5 days seems lik eit must be a bit much. Although this is because I am a fan of petri. He's not a malicious poster in the least. plz to be unbanning, thx guys. Vodka is yer friend. imo. yay. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
What did he do, or what is he accused of doing?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
[ QUOTE ]
What did he do, or what is he accused of doing? [/ QUOTE ] this would certainly help your argument. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
He bumped every Schneids post in BBV from the last several months with a link to Schneids' tournament player of the year award for Canterbury's tournament series.
-DeathDonkey |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
DD is right... and a mod? hot.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
In the cold light of sobriety, I do think that 5 days is a bit much, but can't get really worked up about this.
Jello shots are the devil. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
4 days and 23 hours seems about right to me.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: stinky pete
[ QUOTE ]
In the cold light of sobriety, I do think that 5 days is a bit much, but can't get really worked up about this. Jello shots are the devil. [/ QUOTE ] it's not a lot for literally bumping 30 posts (not exaggerating) and then telling people "i don't care, the mods can ban me if they want" that would be a permaban offense for someone with <100 posts if you really care about him tell him not to [censored] on my forum |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|