Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-16-2007, 01:24 AM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

and 3 and 4 are the ones you might have been able to get away from, hands 1 and 2 are coolers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-16-2007, 02:36 AM
Smart Money Smart Money is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 256
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

[ QUOTE ]
and 3 and 4 are the ones you might have been able to get away from, hands 1 and 2 are coolers

[/ QUOTE ]


Hand 2 is not a cooler.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-16-2007, 03:41 AM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and 3 and 4 are the ones you might have been able to get away from, hands 1 and 2 are coolers

[/ QUOTE ]


Hand 2 is not a cooler.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

no matter how he plays it, he gets stacked
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:46 AM
hielo_uno hielo_uno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 243
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

I think hand 1/2 are okay, tho i prefer to raise a reasonal amount in hand 2 instead of a shove.

For hand 3, i think bet/RR w/ top2 on that board is horrible. It folds out the hands you beat.

For hand 4, i would lead out there. c/r is a little too agressive, especially vs that fishy less than pot under bet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:50 AM
BT2 BT2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,745
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

flat call hand 3, smooth call hand 4. the rest is okay.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-16-2007, 08:56 AM
dalerobk dalerobk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 782
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

I really don't like raising out of the blinds in FR against limpers with marginal hands like JTo and A9s. I don't really see how that leads to a lot of good things. I think that is reflective of a bigger problem in all of these hands (or at least 2-4) and that is that you are way too agro when you should show some caution. Being agro can be good but it can also get you into a heap of trouble as you dig yourself and your stack deeper into the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:20 AM
Smart Money Smart Money is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 256
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and 3 and 4 are the ones you might have been able to get away from, hands 1 and 2 are coolers

[/ QUOTE ]


Hand 2 is not a cooler.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

no matter how he plays it, he gets stacked

[/ QUOTE ]


Absolute nonsense. The best players at $1/$2 are able to avoid getting stacked here when stacks are 100BB deep.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:05 AM
GrandMelon GrandMelon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: getting coolered
Posts: 4,707
Default Re: nl200: did i have to lose a buy in here (multiple hands)

1: standard
2: just make a normal 3 bet and obv get it in
3: flop 3 bet needs to be bigger otherwise ok
4: c/r is the worst option, lead or c/c is better. i prefer c/c
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.