#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you people are teh dumb 1st nuts: 4c 6c 2nd nuts: Ac 4c 3rd nuts: Ac Xx 4th nuts: Kc Xx [/ QUOTE ] DING DING! hands dont need to be coexisting [/ QUOTE ] If you hold a nut flush and your other card blocks a straight flush you hold the nuts. If you have a different kicker and the straight flush is possible you do not hold the nuts. Obviously the hands need to be able to coexist. [/ QUOTE ] listen man.....yes if he held A6 then he would have the nuts...OBV but he doesnt. He had KcQc therfore he holds the fourth nuts since 4c6c, Ac4c, and AcXc all beat him. The fact that all 3 possibilities cant exist in the same hand means nothing /thread |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you people are teh dumb 1st nuts: 4c 6c 2nd nuts: Ac 4c 3rd nuts: Ac Xx 4th nuts: Kc Xx [/ QUOTE ] DING DING! hands dont need to be coexisting [/ QUOTE ] If you hold a nut flush and your other card blocks a straight flush you hold the nuts. If you have a different kicker and the straight flush is possible you do not hold the nuts. Obviously the hands need to be able to coexist. [/ QUOTE ] listen man.....yes if he held A6 then he would have the nuts...OBV but he doesnt. He had KcQc therfore he holds the fourth nuts since 4c6c, Ac4c, and AcXc all beat him. The fact that all 3 possibilities cant exist in the same hand means nothing /thread [/ QUOTE ] its like the 50th nuts or something.. Ac with any kicker beats him here. nice laydown. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
what a retarded thread.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[x] Im now dumber
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[ QUOTE ]
what a retarded thread. [/ QUOTE ] |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[ QUOTE ]
its the third nuts someone could have 4c6c and someone else AcXc fish [/ QUOTE ] no one can have 64cc since someone has 4c already |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [ x ] folded 2nd nuts in minbet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you people are teh dumb 1st nuts: 4c 6c 2nd nuts: Ac 4c 3rd nuts: Ac Xx 4th nuts: Kc Xx [/ QUOTE ] DING DING! hands dont need to be coexisting [/ QUOTE ] If you hold a nut flush and your other card blocks a straight flush you hold the nuts. If you have a different kicker and the straight flush is possible you do not hold the nuts. Obviously the hands need to be able to coexist. [/ QUOTE ] listen man.....yes if he held A6 then he would have the nuts...OBV but he doesnt. He had KcQc therfore he holds the fourth nuts since 4c6c, Ac4c, and AcXc all beat him. The fact that all 3 possibilities cant exist in the same hand means nothing /thread [/ QUOTE ] its like the 50th nuts or something.. Ac with any kicker beats him here. nice laydown. [/ QUOTE ] just to clear everything up with an example. board reads KK662. If you have KK, you has the nuts. so if you're trying to tell me that 66 is the third nuts because K6 is the first nuts you are lol |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|