|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
I'm also looking for a breakdown on how tower rb works.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
The Ongame skins all work identically in that bonuses are deducted from MGR.
Towergaming runs continuous 7x bonuses in addition to their 5x and 10x signup bonuses, and frequently has 5x and 6x reloads. Typically, with rakeback, this is the best deal on Ongame. Having said that, this of course depends on your level and style of play. Towergaming, similar to the other Ongame skins, does not facilitate rakeback, and you rely on your affiliate for a rate and payment. You're best off picking a skin that offers greater value for your style of play. For some, Towergaming continuous bonuses and rakeback can amount to 65-80% total rake back, for others, an offer with a higher rakeback percentage without bonuses may be optimal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
[ QUOTE ]
You're best off picking a skin that offers greater value for your style of play. For some, Towergaming continuous bonuses and rakeback can amount to 65-80% total rake back, for others, an offer with a higher rakeback percentage without bonuses may be optimal. [/ QUOTE ] so what styles of play are best for what skin, we say you can get 35% on tower and 45% on betsson or eurobet |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
It seems that this is a limited time offer. Does anyone know how long this tower bonus thing has been available???
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
[ QUOTE ]
It seems that this is a limited time offer. Does anyone know how long this tower bonus thing has been available??? [/ QUOTE ] At least several months, AFAIK. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
did I get this right, the higher limits you play, the higher the chance that a pure rakeback deal could be better for you than a combined one? so at lower limits the combined is better?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
[ QUOTE ]
did I get this right, the higher limits you play, the higher the chance that a pure rakeback deal could be better for you than a combined one? so at lower limits the combined is better? [/ QUOTE ] Since bonuses are deducted from MGR, and NOT from RB, I don't think there could ever be a situation where RB > RB + Bonus. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ongame what is better?
I have been more of a bonus whore than a rakeback player but I am lately leaning more on the rakeback side and I am going to stay put for a while. I played at two ongame sites over the last couple of months and can comment on them. Betsson and Tower.
I play midstakes (both full and short) and usually 4 table. My numbers for both sites have rb at about the mid 50's with bonuses cashbacks, rakeback etc... I get a better rb rate at Betsson but it seems that Tower may offer more reload bonuses(the future will tell). The thing is both worked quite well for me. I could not find any reload history on Betsson on bonuswhores and they don't even list tower? Anyhow both are good but I think I will lean towards Betsson as the rb rate I have is higher than Tower. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|