![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the 40 FPP qualifiers, does anybody know if I win one, do I have to play in the 2nd round qualifier that week, or can I use it whenever I want? Also, will they give me the option of just using the 4,000 FPP for other purposes rather than having to play in the 2nd round qualifier?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe it is a 2 rounder FPP...40 win only gets you into the next one
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zoobird, you can unregister before registration closes and just take the FPP's
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you can usually just unregister from the 4k fpp tourney and bank the 4k fpp, which you can then use on whatever you want later.
gc |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Are you guys looking in the right place? The double shootouts started yesterday. Lobby -> Events -> WSOP -> Cash Satellites [/ QUOTE ] Yeah they weren't there yesterday morning, and I see that all the WSOP satellites($3R, $27R, $33R, $650, etc.) are all using the old structure(no 800/1600 level etc.) and it pisses me off, *sigh*. Cheers! John |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey guys, here is my e-mail and their response to the structure question
Hello John, Thank you for your email, we appreciate your feedback. We are indeed testing a new betting structure to see how it works, your email has been forwarded to the appropriate department so they can take it into consideration. Regards, Paula PokerStars Support Team ----- Original Message ----- From: me Sent: 2006/03/13 11:59:38 To: support@pokerstars.com Subject: WSOP sats. >Hello, > >I was just dropping you guys an e-mail because I am curious why all of the >WSOP satellites($3R, $27R,$33R, $650, etc.) are all using the old MTT structure >(The structure without the 800/1600 level, and the 8k/16k level), level 11 is >600/1200 and level 12 is 1k/2k, I thought you guys got rid of this structure >with the level 11 being 600/1200 and level 12 being 800/1600 then level 13 >being 1k/2k, kinda like in the MTT tournies. >The new MTT structure is a much better structure, and I am wondering if you >guys intentionally used the old structure, or if that was a mistake that will >hopefully be corrected soon. Anyways thanks for the wonderful site! > >Cheers! >John > > > |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|