Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > BBV4Life

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 09-13-2007, 09:11 AM
wtf6192002 wtf6192002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 107
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

WHAT THE [censored] DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ME SMOKING A CIGARETTE IN AN OPEN [censored] AIR AREA.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-13-2007, 09:12 AM
rjoefish rjoefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saying AAAHHHHHHH
Posts: 1,397
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

I think its funny that smokers (or defenders of) will admit that cigarettes have many carcinogens but won't admit that cigarettes cause cancer, because well, how do you know for sure that it was the cigarettes?? Maybe it was just an odd weather pattern!! lolz
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 09-13-2007, 09:15 AM
wtf6192002 wtf6192002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 107
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

Cigarettes will def kill me. I will have a heart attack stroke or cancer.

Ok now I admitted that so tell me why it matters if I smoke in the open air. No one is going to have an effect in the least from my smoke in the open air areas.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-13-2007, 10:11 AM
bogey1 bogey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 433
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

Smokers generally (as evidenced by some in this thread) will claim the limited smoke I inhale when they're smoking nearby outdoors is so small it doesn't matter.

Well, no, on two counts.

One, it smells awful. If I'm hanging around for a bus, or at a coffee shop, it just sucks to have you stinking up the place for everyone near by.

Two, I'm mildly asmatic. Cigarette smoke sets it off (though, oddly, not so much with pipe smoke). I will, quite literally, have trouble breathing if I'm subject to 2nd hand smoke for any length of time (1 hour is about my max in a bar, couple hours in an outdoor smoking area).

So, I'm all for banning smoking except within your own home. I'll agree, seems incredibly stupid to ban it within your own house. However, if you're renting, I'm in favor of the owner having the right to ban smoking in the house because smoking causes a lot of damage. Carpets have to be cleaned multiple times, the smell actually gets into the drywall and you can't really ever quite get rid of it.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:07 AM
By-Tor By-Tor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SAYING what others are thinking
Posts: 5,120
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

[ QUOTE ]
One, it smells awful. If I'm hanging around for a bus

[/ QUOTE ]

buses and cars, on the other hand, smell like roses.


[ QUOTE ]
Two, I'm mildly asmatic. Cigarette smoke sets it off

[/ QUOTE ]

buy a bubble.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:12 AM
calmB4storm calmB4storm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fluffy White Clouds
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

[ QUOTE ]
One, it smells awful. If I'm hanging around for a bus, or at a coffee shop, it just sucks to have you stinking up the place for everyone near by.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, and while we're at it, let's ban farting in public too! Oh, and all those foreigners seem to smell pretty bad... let's ban them too!

[ QUOTE ]
Two, I'm mildly asmatic. Cigarette smoke sets it off (though, oddly, not so much with pipe smoke). I will, quite literally, have trouble breathing if I'm subject to 2nd hand smoke for any length of time (1 hour is about my max in a bar, couple hours in an outdoor smoking area).

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah! I'm allergic to dogs, cats, peanut butter, Britney Spears, and jean shorts... let's ban them all!

[ QUOTE ]
So, I'm all for banning smoking except within your own home. I'll agree, seems incredibly stupid to ban it within your own house.

[/ QUOTE ]
Banning it from other private property (bars, restaurants, etc.) isn't any less stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:38 AM
rjoefish rjoefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saying AAAHHHHHHH
Posts: 1,397
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

Remember that guy that got in trouble at the WSOP for smelling awful and wearing the same shirt every day? heh
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:42 AM
Trogdor! Trogdor! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 250
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

its all Rob Rieners fault
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:08 PM
bogey1 bogey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 433
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, I'm all for banning smoking except within your own home. I'll agree, seems incredibly stupid to ban it within your own house.

[/ QUOTE ]
Banning it from other private property (bars, restaurants, etc.) isn't any less stupid.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smoking is an invasive thing. Banning it where people congregate is the same reason for noise ordinances, public indency laws, and any number of other laws restricting the few from imposing on the many.

Private residences are one thing where the owner soley determines who visits. Private "property" isn't the same thing as bars are public places even if privately owned.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:24 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: BAN ON SMOKING

Smoking recently got banned in Pubs and clubs completely in the UK and I'm loving it. Banning people from smoking outside is retarded though.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.