#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
I 3b this pf almost every time.
Pot on flop will be $8. Pot on turn will be $19. Now you can shove the turn and count your Slanksy Bucks. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
i prefer a 3bet pre. and putting a raise in somewhere. you underplayed your hand too much.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
No I'm not trying to find a way to justify my line, its just that I aint happy with advice as "reraise". I mean.. that's the same as when you're playing a soccergame and someone in the croud yells SHOOOOOOT. I just like to get advice that comes with an explanation. The part where Skibble made it more clear where he talks abou tthe AF is fine for me and I agree totaly with him. On the other hand I also agree with Genesis, the fact that it might be a WA/WB situation against this villain. The real question here is: how can I find out in hands like these that its an obvious value raise that I have to make or that I'm WA/WB. What range should I put him on, how to play against that range on this board, .. answers like that would be way better then "raise flop $5-$6 dont let him catch up" or "pot pot pot pot" (no offence to the people who posted that, but really, please explain yourself when posting advice) [/ QUOTE ] you have the button and you have a premium hand, so now is the perfect time to build a pot. your hand has a lot of equity (from both cbets and value bets) on most flops, so you're looking to inflate the pot size with position. don't automatically assume aa/kk based on a relatively small sample size. you still need to raise this hand for value preflop. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
By underplaying his hand the OP got the villain to over value his. Without taking the results into the account, he probably got the most value out of this. I like the OP's play in this hand tbh, situationally this passive play can pay off @ at this limit. (without getting sucked out on) Versus raising the flop and villain folding. just my 2.... |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
WA/WB inducing bluffs, played fine vs nit.
May fold river depedning upon bet size and may reraise pre sometimes. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
You could 3-bet preflop, but calling is fine too.
Flop is fine. Prolly raise turn. As played, I call river. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25, hitting top pair against a TAG
3bet preflop, raise flop, rest is fine
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|