Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2007, 02:20 AM
recipro recipro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 455
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
anyone got many hands on who_be_owl at 25 and 50nl?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've never seen him at NL50.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2007, 05:54 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

Id just like to say that all the players you see on Party 50nl with TAG stats are awful at poker. I hvae never sat at a Party 50nl table and had any kind of trouble at all. I dont mean to be rude but Party 50nl is just one huge joke.

You get regs like V_I_P and this guy like tarjheels or whatever it is, but they have no idea how to play postflop and overplay their mediocre hands in bad spots. Here's a hand from V_I_P, who is BB

Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $75.35
BB: $49.25
UTG: $61.11
CO: $76.98
Hero (BTN): $62.97

Preflop: Hero is dealt 8 5 (5 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $2.00</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $6.50</font>, BB calls $6.00, Hero folds

Flop: ($15) J Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9 (2 Players)
<font color="red">SB bets $9.00</font>, BB calls $9.00

Turn: ($33) 6 (2 Players)
<font color="red">SB bets all-in for $59.85</font>, BB calls all-in for $33.75
Uncalled bet of $26.10 returned to SB

River: ($100.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 2 All-In)

Pot Size: $100.50 ($2 Rake)

SB had K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (a straight Nine to King) and WON (+$49.25)
BB had Q A (a pair of Queens) and LOST (-$49.25)

Thats from a 20/15/4. LOLLLL

One of the better guys I've seen is der_rainer but he's so tight that it doesnt even matter. He is about 18/11. You get the occasional guy coming down from 100nl like iamtonismom but even they arent very good.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2007, 06:55 AM
InfectorGadget InfectorGadget is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Laughing with daggers
Posts: 270
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

iamtonismom is a 100NL player? Hes playing 25NL now, and not doing so well either..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:34 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
iamtonismom is a 100NL player? Hes playing 25NL now, and not doing so well either..

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe he was just taking a shot, but i saw him at 100nl for sure. and yes he sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2007, 08:49 AM
pacman2k7 pacman2k7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 257
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

And what about the Full Ring micro games on Party? Is it softer?

Just think about grinding 8-12 table on nl25-nl50.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2007, 09:10 AM
ShipitFMA ShipitFMA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Getting my c-bets minraised
Posts: 2,486
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

50nl is ALOT tougher than 25nl, moreso then people have led me to believe...which isn't too good..

Anyone else agree? or disagree
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2007, 09:12 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
50nl is ALOT tougher than 25nl, moreso then people have led me to believe...which isn't too good..

Anyone else agree? or disagree

[/ QUOTE ]

totally disagree
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2007, 12:15 PM
payoff wizard payoff wizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
50nl is ALOT tougher than 25nl, moreso then people have led me to believe...which isn't too good..

Anyone else agree? or disagree

[/ QUOTE ]

Having recently gone from robusto to busto, I am now staked and rebuilding at 25NL and 50NL. From what I have seen, more players at 50NL play back at aggression, but those that do do so terribly and recklessly. Thus, 50NL may be tougher if you are a weak player, but, if you have a reasonable amount of balls and brains, then it is WAY more profitable (IMHO).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2007, 09:44 AM
Fiksdal Fiksdal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,444
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
iamtonismom is a 100NL player? Hes playing 25NL now, and not doing so well either..

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe he was just taking a shot, but i saw him at 100nl for sure. and yes he sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah I have played 100nL with him. kinda funny, both him and a guy called something like "tony1123" were at my table together. I loled.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2007, 05:21 PM
Fiksdal Fiksdal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,444
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
V_I_P

[/ QUOTE ]

This guy is seriously so extremely bad. He opens a lot of empty tables and when I saw him at them I would often just take four of them and start my session together with him. Him + 4 normal party fishies = sexy time.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.