#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
Whoops, missed the fact the 4-bet preflop. That makes 67s more unlikely and another hand overplayed.
6-bet that sucker and call down a 7-bet. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
I don't think I've ever seen anyone 5-bet a river without the nuts in the 20-40 @ Bay101. 67s is certainly possible for a good player here, I might play a hand just like this if I was in a mood or something, he would probably raise this in the HJ and might cap preflop for deceptive purposes. I just call the 5 bet.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT. [/ QUOTE ] 8betting may be a bit much, but are you really not 6betting????? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
I don't know this villain, but I'd have to say anyone with a tiny bit of a brain has put AA in his opponents range by now. And he's still raising.
I just call. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT. [/ QUOTE ] 8betting may be a bit much, but are you really not 6betting????? [/ QUOTE ] i really am not 6betting. who really 5-bets this river with TT anyways? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I've ever seen anyone 5-bet a river without the nuts in the 20-40 @ Bay101. 67s is certainly possible for a good player here, I might play a hand just like this if I was in a mood or something, he would probably raise this in the HJ and might cap preflop for deceptive purposes. I just call the 5 bet. [/ QUOTE ] This sums it up well. Almost no one in that game is going to five bets with a smaller set the way the hand was played and with the A on the board. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
who really 5-bets this river with TT anyways? [/ QUOTE ] a guy who KNOWS that hero cannot have the nuts or 2nd nuts given the preflop line hero took. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] who really 5-bets this river with TT anyways? [/ QUOTE ] a guy who KNOWS that hero cannot have the nuts or 2nd nuts given the preflop line hero took. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but does the villain "KNOW" the hero would lay down AA in this spot, which is a very likely hand that he has considering the action? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|