#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 4 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)
SB: $83.25 BB: $98.55 Hero (UTG): $105.50 BTN: $100.40 Reads: <font color="blue">Villain seems solid. I'd been somewhat active, but I wasn't sure whether not he would be 3-betting light in a spot like this.</font> Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 Players) <font color="red">Hero raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $12.00</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $8.00 Flop: ($25.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $18.00</font>, Hero calls $18.00 Turn: ($61.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $39.00</font> This bet seems strong after my flop call. Easy fold? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
I definitely fold here. You only beat a bluff.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
Call me a nit but I may fold this preflop without reads.
If we call the flop we are saying that we are beating a majority of villain's range. In saying that, shouldn't we then be betting at the flop? As played, fold Turn. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
Yeah, now that I think about it... if he had any hand that I beat he would likely check behind on the turn here as this is not a board to be 2-barreling and he would likely slowdown with a weaker A.
And yeah, I think folding pf might have been an option because this point I had no strong idea of how aggro he was. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - 4-handed AT vs 3-bet
Everyone in the world folds this preflop even against agro's there is no value esp oop and as "Villain Seems Solid." As played easy fold.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|