Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 07-18-2007, 08:37 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Slim, are you doing ICM or just cEV?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am using the ICM to calculate prize pool equities.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is the breakeven (for Khan) starting range for Kerchinko (or whatever) assuming Rehme calls TT+, AK? And how does that range shift if we add $10 mil to first?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 07-18-2007, 08:41 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If Rahme really had AQ, how did he stop the blood from spurting out of his eyes?

[/ QUOTE ]

He was ridiculously tight for most of the FT. He probably would have folded AK here too.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it correct to fold AQ or AK there? Not berating his play, just curious to what you guys think.

[/ QUOTE ]

I definitely would have folded AQ there
...
I'd probably fold AK here.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 07-18-2007, 08:48 PM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: John Wayne\'s not dead.
Posts: 5,574
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

I'm going to use these hand ranges:
Kravchenko: {22+,A2s+,KTs+,QJs,A3o+,KJo+}
Khan: {22+,A8s+,KJs+,ATo+,KQo}
Rahme: AQo

With those, main pot equities are (ignoring splits):
Kravchenko: 0.28603
Khan: 0.37661
Rahme: 0.33736

The side pot is a little harder because the only situation we care about is when Kravchenko wins the main. It means AQo probably missed and I think is going to make Khan's range fare a little better on those boards against AQo, but for now I'll just assume they split 50/50.

EV_call=0.33736(4486.323)+0.37661(2253.401)+0.2860 3(0.5*3733.200+0.5*2094.028)
=3195.628

EV_fold=0.56062(3289.466)+0.43938(3237.937)=3266.8 25

Mucking AQo wins by about $71,000.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 07-18-2007, 09:03 PM
GotQuads GotQuads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 181
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to use these hand ranges:
Kravchenko: {22+,A2s+,KTs+,QJs,A3o+,KJo+}
Khan: {22+,A8s+,KJs+,ATo+,KQo}
Rahme: AQo

With those, main pot equities are (ignoring splits):
Kravchenko: 0.28603
Khan: 0.37661
Rahme: 0.33736

The side pot is a little harder because the only situation we care about is when Kravchenko wins the main. It means AQo probably missed and I think is going to make Khan's range fare a little better on those boards against AQo, but for now I'll just assume they split 50/50.

EV_call=0.33736(4486.323)+0.37661(2253.401)+0.2860 3(0.5*3733.200+0.5*2094.028)
=3195.628

EV_fold=0.56062(3289.466)+0.43938(3237.937)=3266.8 25

Mucking AQo wins by about $71,000.

[/ QUOTE ]

I looked at the numbers you posted earlier, it seems close with AQ but AK looks like a clear call.

Whether Khans range includes the smallest pairs is probably of minor relevance with AK/AQ.

Good post Slim
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 07-18-2007, 10:08 PM
candyman718 candyman718 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 580
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

I know this is not a sophisticated mathematical point, but it seems like a lot of the above posts are putting your opponent on a hand (or a range) that would justify a call. What have you witnessed from the initial raiser that would indicate that he would go in so lightly?

BTW, in general I hate the SB's play here with anything less than 66.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 07-18-2007, 10:17 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

I said this once in the thread, and nobody listened.

One thing none of you are factoring in, is how few hands they are playing per hour, and it's impact on the players stacks/m's/whatever.

They played 14 hands per hour. This is kind of like playing a turbo online. RainKhan doesn't have the liberty of waiting around for "more +cEV" situations. This is +cEV. +$EV. And +EV in general.

This push is so amazingly standard it's not even funny. The only discussion I can see from this hand is Rahme's fold...but given how tight RainKhan had been playing, I think his fold is okay.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 07-18-2007, 10:35 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

i find myself in agreement with ZBTHorton over and over on this final table

I'm happy to be in his camp
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 07-18-2007, 11:24 PM
GotQuads GotQuads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 181
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
I said this once in the thread, and nobody listened.

One thing none of you are factoring in, is how few hands they are playing per hour, and it's impact on the players stacks/m's/whatever.

They played 14 hands per hour. This is kind of like playing a turbo online. RainKhan doesn't have the liberty of waiting around for "more +cEV" situations. This is +cEV. +$EV. And +EV in general.

This push is so amazingly standard it's not even funny. The only discussion I can see from this hand is Rahme's fold...but given how tight RainKhan had been playing, I think his fold is okay.

[/ QUOTE ]

What you're saying doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

Even in a turbo structure you cannot win money that is not in the pot yet. If you have a large M you have a large M. Only if the blinds are about to double up next hand and you're UTG there's some resemblance of logic to what you're saying. This was not the case and Khan was in the SB.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 07-18-2007, 11:43 PM
Jasper109 Jasper109 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Praying for a flopped set
Posts: 1,393
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I said this once in the thread, and nobody listened.

One thing none of you are factoring in, is how few hands they are playing per hour, and it's impact on the players stacks/m's/whatever.

They played 14 hands per hour. This is kind of like playing a turbo online. RainKhan doesn't have the liberty of waiting around for "more +cEV" situations. This is +cEV. +$EV. And +EV in general.

This push is so amazingly standard it's not even funny. The only discussion I can see from this hand is Rahme's fold...but given how tight RainKhan had been playing, I think his fold is okay.

[/ QUOTE ]

What you're saying doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

Even in a turbo structure you cannot win money that is not in the pot yet. If you have a large M you have a large M. Only if the blinds are about to double up next hand and you're UTG there's some resemblance of logic to what you're saying. This was not the case and Khan was in the SB.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I was thinking as well, but thought I was missing something.

There was only one time all night (Kravchenko, I believe) when a player should have been in push/fold mode and he doubled up very soon after that.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:33 AM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting rivered by idiots
Posts: 6,558
Default Re: Rainkhan and the 33 versus Alex Kravchenko

[ QUOTE ]
I said this once in the thread, and nobody listened.

One thing none of you are factoring in, is how few hands they are playing per hour, and it's impact on the players stacks/m's/whatever.

They played 14 hands per hour. This is kind of like playing a turbo online. RainKhan doesn't have the liberty of waiting around for "more +cEV" situations. This is +cEV. +$EV. And +EV in general.

This push is so amazingly standard it's not even funny. The only discussion I can see from this hand is Rahme's fold...but given how tight RainKhan had been playing, I think his fold is okay.

[/ QUOTE ]

1.) The "turboness" of an event should have a very minor effect on one's play in the current hand, unless it is totally absurd like blinds double every 4 hands. When the blinds go up, deal with it then. We went through this discussion about 2349781234789123 times in the STT forum after turbos became the standard format for STT pros.

2.) It takes 3 levels = 6 hours for the blinds to double at the ME final table. Even at 14 hands an hour, this is not a turbo structure. So even the argument that you should accept a lower minimum edge does not hold water. There is plenty of time. Look how long the damn thing lasted even after so many early bustouts.

3.) Khan's push is far from "amazingly standard". It is "highly marginal". It is a very tough spot. You are not giving up much either way. There are many, many factors to consider. See the detailed analysis above. "Amazingly standard" would be calling with QQ+. Please don't overstate whatever case you may have.

Other than that... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.