![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 16th is not the culprit; it is the 14th which created the Federal citizen.
That amendment is not properly ratified. See it here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut...ndmentxiv.html And here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourtee...s_Constitution [ QUOTE ] Controversy over ratification A number of individuals argue that the ratification of the 14th Amendment violated Article V of the Constitution. For instance, Bruce Ackerman argues that: * The 14th Amendment was proposed by a rump Congress that did not include representatives and senators from most ex-Confederate states, and, had those congressmen been present, the Amendment would never have passed. * Ex-Confederate states were counted for Article V purposes of ratification, but were not counted for Article I purposes of representation in Congress. * The ratifications of the ex-Confederate states were not truly free, but were coerced. For instance, many ex-Confederate states had their readmittance to the Union conditioned on ratifying the 14th Amendment.[5] [/ QUOTE ] What's that smell? Some USA-born Afro-Americans argue, perhaps correctly, that they never agreed to Federal citizenship and therefore are not required to pay. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|