#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
perky loses then says 'double or nothing' and its agreed
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
Maybe they are just using the rake as a way of a "min-blind-escalation" so the match wont take forever?
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
i think traheho won the next 1 sharpish.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
Yeah Perky's aces got cracked by a QTs backdoor gutshot (+ flush draw).. Total rake for the double or nothing rematch was $3.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
this is great because I saw this when going to sit in and didnt know how to start a thread on it and didnt feel like opening up this webpage
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] the rake is gonna eat into it so much eventually that it will become more like a crapshoot. the rake eating their stacks is somewhat like blinds going up [/ QUOTE ] They should have done this on play money. [/ QUOTE ] There aren't any heads up play money tables. [/ QUOTE ] Doh, they should go to a 6 max .50-1 playmoney table and have 4 of their friends sitting out at the table. I'd expect them to be a little more creative, ya know, being high stakes pro and all. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: traheho v perkyshmerky 50cent/1.00 NL???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Good thing these guys don't post on 2+2 (or do they?) or else the winner would probably post in NVG asking about what they should do because they forgot about the rake raping them in small stakes and he thinks he should have won more. [/ QUOTE ] It's a freezeout- the guy with zero pays the full $100k. [/ QUOTE ] Traheo has an account and I've seen his post a couple of times. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|