#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
others do the same ... which is another reason a bet is good in this spot.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
I think checking behind the turn is some results oriented thinking; there's a lot of value to be had with a turn bet.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
I check the turn here a lot, but once you do that, you pretty much have to call all blank rivers.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
If villian is so smart why is he pricing us in for our full house draw with his made flush?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
[ QUOTE ]
If villian is so smart why is he pricing us in for our full house draw with his made flush? [/ QUOTE ] Cause board is totally safe for his flush assuming i don't have a set. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
[ QUOTE ]
Ac doesn't change anything either. [/ QUOTE ] It makes it somewhat more likely he has naked A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] IMO. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
Kramer, it's not that a flush card turned, it's that a flush card turned in combination with villain's specific line. I agree that checking behind on the turn with a set head's up is generally not something you should be doing, but this is an exception.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
[ QUOTE ]
I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that? [/ QUOTE ] Shoving into an opponent who has represented a hand that has us beat? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
[ QUOTE ]
I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that? [/ QUOTE ] What exactly is this supposed to accomplish? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|