#241
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
25k at 3.3 (200NL)
6k at 12.0 (100NL) all this week (nothing in jan/feb) |
#242
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
36k hands at 1.70 ptbb/100(200 NL) [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
62k hands at 1.55 ptbb/100(100 NL) [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I'd actually never checked my 100 NL stats for all post-legislation time but damn I kind of suck. Thank god for rakeback and bonuses |
#243
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
Lol just realized I changed it from ptbb/100 to the standard bb/100. I have like 25k hands at 4.93bb/100 at 5/1.
|
#244
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
wait how are we supposed to be measuring them usually? I just read numbers off of poker tracker. SHould my numbers be multiplied by two? PLease say yes.
|
#245
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
[ QUOTE ]
wait how are we supposed to be measuring them usually? I just read numbers off of poker tracker. SHould my numbers be multiplied by two? PLease say yes. [/ QUOTE ] They'll never be multiplied by 2, but they could be divided by 2 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] People generally use ptbb/100 when calculating winrates, but in the latest patch of pokertracker you can use standard bigblinds/100 not ptbb/100. I think it's auto set on ptbb/100 though. You can change it in preference tab. |
#246
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
played 44k hands at 100nl, at 3.65ptbb/100 usually 4tabling. was 5ptbb/100 after like 40k hands btw...tried 12tabling once 100nl after i moved up to 200nl, that wasn't a good idea. i dont know how people like weak tite n stuff do it.
played 44k hands at 200nl, at 6.32ptbb/100 normally 6tabling, sometimes 4tabling. plan to move up before i have a reliable sample size though (200k), 44k hands dont mean anything imho. I think the reason my winrate is so much higher at 200nl is because some of the hands in my 100nl db are when i used to do things like open limp and stuff, and generally i think my game has WAAAYY improved while playing 200nl and being forced to play tables full of 2p2ers all the time. From memory i think some of the best 200nl's are KeanuReaver (dont play him oop), carrotsnake(when not tilting), Ldonnie, Suntzureps,jigsaws,murph0311--murphsomething, cant remmeber the numbers,,, Tatatunes, Rock Ness(one of the best non-nitty 12tablers), wpr101, redgrape, Steal City. |
#247
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
lol - im obv best 200NL reg - adam001.
|
#248
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
I don't know how the hell people can play more than 6 tables on stars. I play 12 on FT easy but on stars things just happen so much quicker. Do we have any 8+ stars multi-tablers here? If so how do you do it?
|
#249
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
yea I agree - I was 8-9 tabling on stars 200nl but since i have moved to 6 tbls my game has improved significantly.
|
#250
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL STARS REGS THREAD***
Guys, do you realize that PTBB/100 is diff. than BB/100? How can anyone have a winrate of 7PTBB/100??
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|