#1
|
|||
|
|||
river overbet shove bluff
Kind of a weird decision here by me... let me explain my thought process a bit.
Villain and I don't have much history... he's a seemingly nitty 17/15 type nitty tagg. I'm playing kind of nitty as well, and I've been really sick the last couple weeks so this is my first session in a while. River I'm shoving $377 to win $72 so initial risk:reward type thinking suggests it's awful. However, how often can he ever call here, especially considering that I have the ace of spades? For anyone thinking I'm just making a stupid image post, I want to clarify and say that I think everytime I've ever made a shove in a similar spot, it's been 100% pure nuts, every time. This would suggest that he probably couldn't call profitably without them, although I wouldn't ever expect him to fold something like JsXs. Anyway, thoughts? If nothing else, I hope this is a break from the standard, boring hands everyone is so used to seeing. POKERSTARS GAME #13481038377: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($2/$4) - 2007/11/26 - 12:41:18 (ET) Table 'Lutetia IV' 6-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: karelr ($477.30 in chips) Seat 2: Lucky_WIns ($543.30 in chips) Seat 3: stdjog12 ($482.85 in chips) Seat 4: Lukieplaya ($412.80 in chips) Seat 5: oppy01 ($260.75 in chips) Seat 6: suz2209 ($325.20 in chips) Lucky_WIns: posts small blind $2 stdjog12: posts big blind $4 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Lukieplaya [As Qd] Lukieplaya: raises $10 to $14 oppy01: folds suz2209: folds karelr: folds Lucky_WIns: calls $12 stdjog12: folds *** FLOP *** [7s Jc 3c] Lucky_WIns: checks Lukieplaya: bets $22 Lucky_WIns: calls $22 *** TURN *** [7s Jc 3c] [8s] Lucky_WIns: checks Lukieplaya: checks *** RIVER *** [7s Jc 3c 8s] [Ts] Lucky_WIns: checks Lukieplaya: bets $376.80 and is all-in |
|
|