![]() |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It is a positive to have employees who can communicate in Spanish. However, it is imperative that you be able to communicate in English! [/ QUOTE ] Why because you say so? Did you just declare an official state language for all of America right here on 2+2? Is that now the law of the land? Sorry, dude, but you don't get to tell every business and state/local govt in America which language it MUST conduct its business in. [/ QUOTE ] I never said I did. I simply said that if a business owner won't hire someone who can't speak English, good for him. He's got an advantage over someone who will when I need whatever service he provides. A business owner has the right to hire whomever he chooses. A question to you. If I have two otherwise equally qualified candidates apply for a job, with the exception that one cannot speak English, so I go with the one who can, would you support that candidates right to sue me for not hiring him, because I instead chose the other candidate? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not debating about suing for a right to work without knowing English. I'm debating your attempt to rail against mandatory Spanish training for your job while at the same time advocating support for a mandatory English policy for another job. You can't have it both ways. And appealing to majority doesn't justify your hypocrisy. In some locales, Spanish is the majority anyway. |
|
|