|
View Poll Results: Why aren't I the voluptuous black lady? | |||
Because I'm a douche | 31 | 26.27% | |
Because I'm stupid | 24 | 20.34% | |
Because I don't like +EV | 63 | 53.39% | |
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FutureDoc, Look inside.....[CENSORED] THREAD! [CENSORED] THREAD!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i don't mean to be rude, but is there a reason that you wouldn't just put that into SNGPT? [/ QUOTE ] Yea sorry, I already have the ranges in SNGWiz, I was just trying to figure out why theres a discrepancy between SNGWiz and the propokertools tournalyzer. I don't use the propokertools for SNGs but a friend does and told me it has him only calling TT+ ( lol) here, while SNGWiz has us calling (55+,A8s+) which is obviously more reasonable. Is there something simple I'm missing as to why ProPokerTools has us calling 4% and SNGWiz has us calling 10%? [/ QUOTE ] Call hands: 55+,ATo+,A8s+,KQs (10.3%) That's with antes (assuming stars) and adjusting 20% pushing range to include 22, 33, and 44 which most players don't differentiate from 55. I have know idea what ProPokerTools is. |
|
|