lagging it up

[rzk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
These are Hero's eq vs various ranges

[/ QUOTE ]
this is not the right way to solve this problem

u should look at each turn card and see how much u profit vs each hand in his range.

[/ QUOTE ]


you are right of course and i'm sure oink knows this. he just did the calculation assuming neutral implied odds. the interesting question is how wide the villain's range has to be for the implied odds to actually be neutral. to answer this question we pretty much have to do exactly what you say (which is a p.i.t.a.), but just intuitively: do you think they are positive, neutral, or negative if the villain's range is

[ QUOTE ]
88+,7c7d,7c7h,7d7h,6c6d,6c6h,6d6h,5c5d,5c5h,5d5h,A Ts+,KJs+,KcTc,KdTd,QcJc,QdJd,QcTc,QdTd,JcTc,JdTd,T c9c,Td9d,AJo+,KQo


[/ QUOTE ]

(vs. which we have 18% equity)

oink seems to think they are positive, unless i'm misunderstanding him, but i'd guess they are still negative.