#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shaniac + Russo Niagara Hand
I've read this thread:
Original Thread I really enjoyed it but it turned into a theoretical argument that most would agree went on for too long (although I enjoyed most of the argument too). Discussion of the actual hand faded. Here are the quotes concerning the action: [ QUOTE ] 25-50 blinds effective stacks all 20k cdbr3799 raises UTG+1 with 4h7h to 150 UTG+2 calls UTG+3 calls Cutoff calls (shaniac) SB calls (vanessa rousso) flop 8s 6s 5d SB checks CDBR3799 bets 400 UTG+2 folds UTG+3 calls 400 Cutoff (shaniac) raises to 1800 SB (vanessa) raises to 4200 [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] cdbr folds. turn is an offsuit deuce or something, and vanessa rousso check calls 7k leaving 9k behind. the river is a offuist 9 (final board 86529), and vanessa checks. shaniac instashoves for 9k and vanessa says "looks like you missed your flushdraw" and calls. shaniac shows 74 for 9-high straight (same hand as cdbr pre) and vanessa shows 85o for two pair. [/ QUOTE ] Never saw Shaniac's last action on the flop, but I'm assuming he called which led to Russo's spot on read. I fully understand that Shane is 100x the player I am, but does anyone have any thoughts on his line? I know that Russo is regarded as terrible, but is it generally expected that she's this bad? What % of players in a 10K tournament would you expect to call this river shove with anything that's not winning/splitting? Shane, if you happen to see this....was there something specific you'd seen from her that gave you this read? Did you have the 7 of spades, assuming you were splitting at worst? Thanks all. Very informative discussion about the hand so far. |
|
|