Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-30-2007, 01:40 PM
maverickai maverickai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 338
Default AA\'s pot equity on a very dangerous flop

I was dealt pocket aces OOP, and the preflop was capped with 4 players seeing the flop.

Flop came 9 T J clubs.

can't remember if I bet out first, but 2 players folded, and the flop was capped between me and one villian who had showed aggression on preflop (I think he's the only one who re-raised me).

Turn came a rag, and it went 3-bets.

River came another rag, and I just checked/call, given the aggro he showed on the turn too.

He turned over JJ, he had a set.

So I was wondering how much pot equity my AA has against this kinda flop, and the possible range vilian might had. I was expecting that I would still have >50%, but to my surprise....
<font color="brown">
Board: Tc Jc 9c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 30.818% 28.32% 02.50% 12617 1112.50 { AdAh }
Hand 1: 69.182% 66.68% 02.50% 29708 1112.50 { TT+, AQs+, KQs, AKo, KQo }
</font>
so AA is no good!

If I had changed '9c' of the flop cards to an 8c, outcome would be:
<font color="brown">
Board: Tc Jc 8c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 54.131% 51.63% 02.50% 23003 1112.50 { AdAh }
Hand 1: 45.869% 43.37% 02.50% 19322 1112.50 { TT+, AQs+, KQs, AKo, KQo }
</font>
If the '9c' is a rag, outcome would be:
<font color="brown">
Board: Tc Jc 2h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 68.527% 67.34% 01.19% 30001 528.00 { AdAh }
Hand 1: 31.473% 30.29% 01.19% 13493 528.00 { TT+, AQs+, KQs, AKo, KQo }

</font>
OK, this might not be very startling to many of you, but it is a revelation to me, and I'll keep in mind if such a scenario comes up. And I'm typing out my thoughts like what sushi advocated in his 'Make Serious Posts' post.

So this stove result seems kinda counter intuitive to me. Anyone has any more of such startling discoveries?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.