|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you voted Rep, was your reason.... | |||
| Family Values - Religion |
   
|
3 | 12.00% |
| Dem Scandals - Individ. character |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Military - Iraq |
  
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Branding - loyalty |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Economy - taxes |
  
|
12 | 48.00% |
| Poker |
  
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
10-27-2007, 05:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
Guys, you're making this out to be more complicated than it is. Just think about it.
We either win the pot or lose the pot each time the villain calls. Our equity versus his range tells us the likelihood of each of these events happening, and hence the distribution of outcomes. In other words, the distribution of wins and loses depends solely on our equity. This means that, for any 2 given situations in which our pot equity is the same, the variance will also be the same. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode