|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: If you voted Rep, was your reason.... | |||
| Family Values - Religion |
   
|
3 | 12.00% |
| Dem Scandals - Individ. character |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Military - Iraq |
  
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Branding - loyalty |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Economy - taxes |
  
|
12 | 48.00% |
| Poker |
  
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#20
10-27-2007, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Something I\'ve been thinking about
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Since the distribution is the same... [/ QUOTE ] What do you mean by that? Distributions of those 5 examples are not the same... [/ QUOTE ] Hero has 50% equity against villain's stated range in all 5 examples. When we know the villain's range with 100% certainty, the only thing that matters is our equity against that range. The composition of that range is irrelevant. The composition of villain's range generally DOES matter, because we aren't 100% confident in that range. We need to analyze, even if only by gut feel, how sensitive our equity is to small changes in the range. [/ QUOTE ] Yea, ignore my comment, I am hallucinating. Same mean, same distribution, same variance. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode