AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[Guthrie]

[ QUOTE ]
Actually, I thought about it, and the money awarded back to the players shouldn't be a percentage of losses. It should be a dollar amount that is a function of hands played versus the cheaters and the limits where they played.

[/ QUOTE ]

The counter argument would be that the superuser would not even have been playing had he not been able to see hole cards, so you would have never had the opportunity to win money from him when he made a wrong decision.

The counter counter argument would be that you were also deprived of money you would have won from a third player had the superuser not been in the game. He should have folded most of his hands preflop, leaving you and the others to legitimately fight over the pots.

This could go on forever.