We haven't won yet: latest (10/19) cliff's notes on AP scandal

[___1___]

A couple things...

Obviously, I find the idea of a rogue programmer trying to prove managment wrong far-fetched to say the least. However, I feel fine holding off judgement until AP releases a statement that will hopefully answer a bunch of questions.

Assuming AP continues with the rogue programmer story, how feasible would the following be...

The AP employee in question (or even an AP managment rep intimately familiar with the situation) takes a polygraph from a mutually agreed upon expert with a 2+2 and Pocket Fives representative present.

I have a feeling something like that is the only way many of us will be satisfied with much of AP's explanation. Again, hopefully AP's statement will say a lot.