#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 400 | I\'m a huge nit with sets
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He had 43s for turned two-pair, so I missed getting his whole stack in this instance with my check-behind. [/ QUOTE ] If you really think that's true then I definitely have to move back to Party. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely... look at that board. I think a two or three-barrel on my part is going to look extremely suspicious. Would you fold two-pair facing a second barrel on a 7-5-3-4 board? |
|
|