#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latest cliffsnotes on Absolute soulreading.
OK.
I've just read the wikipedia entry on standard deviation, and am more convinced than ever before that flight2q has no idea what a standard deviation is. The idea of calculating a standard deviation on a single result from 190 hands is absurd. A standard deviation is a measure of a spread of results. Inherently, a single result obviously can't be spread. So, I took the bb/100 data in excel, and firstly found the mean of the 5251 results. The mean was -4.0493. That is, of the 5,251 players who played over 500 hands, they lost on average 4bb/100. I then used MS Excel's STDEVA function to calculate the standard devation of that same sample ('cause I certainly wasn't doing 5,000+ calcs by hand!) and it reported that there was a standard deviation of 31.54. Now, the cheater's BB/100 was 475.74. That is a whopping 15.2 standard deviations from the mean. To put that into perspective, Wikipedia lists confidence intervals for standard distributions that assume normally distributed data: σ 68.26894921371% 2σ 95.44997361036% 3σ 99.73002039367% 4σ 99.99366575163% 5σ 99.99994266969% 6σ 99.99999980268% 7σ 99.99999999974% They don't even bother going past 7 standard deviations because of how rare such occurences are. |
|
|