Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 10-10-2007, 03:51 AM
Josem Josem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 4,780
Default Re: Latest cliffsnotes on Absolute soulreading.

OK.

I've just read the wikipedia entry on standard deviation, and am more convinced than ever before that flight2q has no idea what a standard deviation is.

The idea of calculating a standard deviation on a single result from 190 hands is absurd.

A standard deviation is a measure of a spread of results. Inherently, a single result obviously can't be spread.


So, I took the bb/100 data in excel, and firstly found the mean of the 5251 results. The mean was -4.0493. That is, of the 5,251 players who played over 500 hands, they lost on average 4bb/100.

I then used MS Excel's STDEVA function to calculate the standard devation of that same sample ('cause I certainly wasn't doing 5,000+ calcs by hand!) and it reported that there was a standard deviation of 31.54.

Now, the cheater's BB/100 was 475.74. That is a whopping 15.2 standard deviations from the mean.

To put that into perspective, Wikipedia lists confidence intervals for standard distributions that assume normally distributed data:

σ 68.26894921371%
2σ 95.44997361036%
3σ 99.73002039367%
4σ 99.99366575163%
5σ 99.99994266969%
6σ 99.99999980268%
7σ 99.99999999974%

They don't even bother going past 7 standard deviations because of how rare such occurences are.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.