|
View Poll Results: Generally speaking, how much luck is involved in determining the outcome of a game of Monopoly? | |||
0-20% | 22 | 5.76% | |
21-40% | 70 | 18.32% | |
41-60% | 77 | 20.16% | |
61-80% | 140 | 36.65% | |
81-100% | 73 | 19.11% | |
Voters: 382. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Theory & Pactice or Profesional No Limit?
[ QUOTE ]
I didn't read the OP or any of the replys, but the answer is PNL. [/ QUOTE ] OK, now I've read the whole thread. I stand by my answer. I got so much more out of PNL. It isn't even funny. NLH:T&P had lots of "thought exparaments" and "tips" for playing NL hold'em, but PNL is just so much more practicle. It really helps me understand concepts like adjusting my play to my oponents stack size, and understand things like why the Rule of 5 & 10 is important. Plus, PNL is all about playing after the flop. And that is where the mistakes are the most costly. Now maybe I go so much out of PNL simple because I've read NLH:T&P five times. Perhaps that's true, but to be honest I had to read NLH:T&P three times just to understand a single word of it. |
|
|