Rule debate on NL pot capping (AP implemented wrong?)

[dealace1]

The following thread contains a HH from an Absolute Poker NL hand where a pot is capped by an allin even though the allin amount exceeded the previous raise.

The BB was 100 and an EP put in 300 to the pot, a subsequent player shoved in his remaining 513 and that capped the pot.

If the original raise is considered 200, as would be my understanding, then the shove of 513 should keep the pot open since the raise is greater than the previous raise of 200 chips.

I guess if the original raise is considered 300 chips as the HH verbage states then the capping is correct.

Would appreciate a clarification on this. Do all sites handle this situations the same way? Does AP have it wrong?

Hand History:

Stage #928484573 Tourney ID 1888549 Holdem Single Tournament No Limit $100 - 2007-10-02 23:32:06 (ET)
Table: 16730573 (Real Money) Seat #7 is the dealer
Seat 1 - IYAOYAS53 ($1215 in chips)
Seat 2 - KARENJOII ($513.34 in chips)
Seat 3 - POLKBOY ($2103.33 in chips)
Seat 6 - LODO420 ($1960 in chips)
Seat 7 - WIDERGLIDE ($1225 in chips)
Seat 8 - ANDYBBALLA ($4293.33 in chips)
Seat 9 - PEPPERPOKER1 ($2190 in chips)
ANDYBBALLA - Posts small blind $50
PEPPERPOKER1 - Posts big blind $100
*** POCKET CARDS ***
Dealt to IYAOYAS53 [Jc Jh]
IYAOYAS53 - Raises $300 to $300
KARENJOII - All-In(Raise) $513.34 to $513.34
POLKBOY - Calls $513.34
LODO420 - Folds
WIDERGLIDE - Folds
ANDYBBALLA - Folds
PEPPERPOKER1 - Folds
IYAOYAS53 - Calls $213.34

(pot was capped, no raising allowed)


http://forum.absolutepoker.com/index...t=0#entry74717

I had originally posted this in the 'Beginners' forum but was advised that it wouldn't get the responses there.