#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
I thought I'd cross post this over here, since it is so outrageously laughable.
I don't normally get in on the press bashing threads because, well, I just don't read that crap. Unfortuantely, this one was on the front page of ESPN NCAAFB. web page Synopsis. USC *might* play a more difficult schedule than LSU. NO [censored] SHERLOCK!!!! Does he not realize that the Pac-10 plays an one more confernence game than the SEC? That's one less cupcake. Does he realize that USC schedules the toughest non conference schedule of any team in a BCS conference? Does he not realize that the Pac-10 is arguably the toughest conference top to bottom in the nation? I took a look at the Sagarin strength of schedule ratings, and by that measure, the last time LSU played a more difficult was 2001! LSU was ranked 20th and USC 24th! In the last 9 years, USC has played a top 10 schedule four times, and the 11th toughest twice. LSU? ZERO!!! |
|
|