#1
|
|||
|
|||
The good guys
I understand that many people feel that American foreign policy is a force for good in the world.
Do any supporters of American foreign policy feel that disagreement, to the point of violent confrontation, with the legitimacy of American tactics cannot possibly be justified? In other words, is it possible that one (say an iraqi citizen) could view US policy as morally repugnant and be morally justified in attacking US troops? I personally think it is quite possible to hold both views concurrently. One can feel that moving into the middle east as we've done will be of long term benefit to the world, while thinking those who attack our troops could be morally justified in doing so. |
|
|