![]() |
|
View Poll Results: So, what was it? | |||
Incredible Comeback! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 10.00% |
Incredible Choke! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 90.00% |
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
. . I do have one comment about TF's position. His CA initiative very likely shuts out affiliates, yet PPA gives him front-page links on their web site, plus John Pappas has personally discussed the initiative with him. I was actually quite curious how PPA would handle TF's proposal on a number of levels....I'm happy with their level of advocacy, and I think TF is as well (I can't speak for him, of course). [/ QUOTE ] I am certainly happy to have a link on the PPA website, thanks John. I believe that the PPA realizes that genuinely legal online poker with free access, easy funding, and the right to advertise would create poker boom part II. This is a rising tide that would lift all boats, online, B&M, big tournaments like a 25,000 entrant WSOP, magazines, affiliates, poker forums, books, etc, etc, etc. I am still puzzled that some smart politicos have not recognized that it would also have the potential to generate some much appreciated (not necessarily much needed) revenue. And it could be done without ruinous taxation rates. The golden goose principle would be in play. Let the goose lay a modest egg everyday, and the goose will lay forever. Tuff |
|
|