Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 08-28-2007, 02:23 AM
mrjetguy mrjetguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: pokertube
Posts: 989
Default To make a tournament +ev I have to be better than X% of the players?

I know this is a bad question that has no definitive answer, but I think it is interesting to consider. Obviously we have to consider everything in the longrun to make this worthwhile. But say I want to play in a tournament with a 10% rake (ie: $20+2), what percent of the players do I have to be better than to make the tournament profitable to play in? Beyond that, say I was in the top 10% or top 1%, what kind of ROI would I then expect.

I know so much of this depends on playing styles and other factors, but I think some sort of general math based answers can be had. I would just like to hear some thoughts about this. This is more something that I was thinking about and found interesting than something I have to know so that I can make decisions about what tournaments to play in.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.