![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skall, DOJ probably wishes the exclusionary language in the Act which ratified the GATS had excluded the WTO as a "defense", but I do not read it that way.
Kaplan clearly HAS standing, he IS being prosecuted, and to my reading ... he CAN argue the WTO as a defense. (This is not to say he will prevail, but he has a motion won already allowing the argument to be made. |
|
|