|
View Poll Results: yes, but how much have you lost playing poker during your lifetime? | |||
Less than 50k | 16 | 32.65% | |
50 - 100k | 1 | 2.04% | |
100 - 200k | 2 | 4.08% | |
200 - 300k | 0 | 0% | |
300 -500k | 0 | 0% | |
500k - 1mm | 3 | 6.12% | |
1mm-2mm | 0 | 0% | |
2mm-3mm | 0 | 0% | |
3mm-4mm | 0 | 0% | |
4mm+ | 27 | 55.10% | |
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: For moral relativists
Absolute morality is an idealized concept that could never concievably exist. You can't make any meaningful statement about the 'consistency' of morality in a society when it is impossible to find two people with the same exact set of morals.
Treating people equally, I'm all for that. But I'm not sure how this lends itself to any point you may be trying to make. |
|
|