#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hand from Schneid\'s Blog
PapaWarbucks: posts small blind $100
tongni1: posts big blind $200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to PapaWarbucks [7h 7s] Quackers: raises $200 to $400 Shankar825: calls $400 Hoss_TBF: raises $200 to $600 Baffa: folds PapaWarbucks: calls $500 tongni1: calls $400 Quackers: raises $200 to $800 Betting is capped Shankar825: calls $400 Hoss_TBF: calls $200 PapaWarbucks: calls $200 tongni1: calls $200 *** FLOP *** [Ad 8s As] PapaWarbucks: checks tongni1: checks Quackers: checks Shankar825: checks Hoss_TBF: bets $200 PapaWarbucks: calls $200 tongni1: folds Quackers: folds Shankar825: folds *** TURN *** [Ad 8s As] [Tc] PapaWarbucks: checks Hoss_TBF: checks *** RIVER *** [Ad 8s As Tc] [8h] PapaWarbucks: checks Hoss_TBF: bets $400 PapaWarbucks: calls $400 *** SHOW DOWN *** Hoss_TBF: shows [9d 9h] (two pair, Aces and Nines) PapaWarbucks: mucks hand Hoss_TBF collected $5195 from pot I don't know whether to call Hoss a genius or an idiot for making this river bet. My thinking on the flop is he will bet the flop with any pocket pair, or flush draw. After he checked the turn I decided it was quite possible my 77 is a higher pocket pair than he has. So, when the river counterfeits it, and he bets, it just seems entirely possible that he can be betting 66. From his perspective with his 99, I don't see how he can think I have KQo (so it'd pretty much have to be KsQs), and it's still possible I can have a JJ or whatever if I got cute and didn't cap. In any case, I think he must've bet it thinking if I had a K hi flush draw I'd call. And I called because I thought 66 could be in his range. Am I misreading this or does his line on the river make absolutely no sense as does his explanation? |
|
|