Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old 08-01-2007, 05:35 PM
LeapFrog LeapFrog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mystery time!
Posts: 1,173
Default Re: Tuff Fish\'s proposal cleared by CA Sec. of State for petition circ

I am aware of Tuff's arguments. I would bet even 80 year old pensioners play 2 tables or maybe 3! Fish like action (high vpp anyone?).

If one was seeking investment capital for a poker site with a 1 table max any financial adviser worth his salt who looked at the situation would laugh you out of the room(they are all going to laugh at you).

Your costs are going to be almost identical over the long run (less bandwidth obv, less 'server power' needed) but the biggest expense is going to be personnel/advertising -- so why shoot yourself in the foot? I don't buy the multitabling sharks killing off all the fish theory either. Guess what, almost every site apparently sees it the same way!

PacificPoker was ahead of its time though, they had some real trend setters in charge. As an example, they let me cash out a $100 bonus after playing 100 hands micro limit. I bet their exces have all gone fortune 500 now [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]


--- Also, thanks for posting the link to the initiative.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.