![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The point is that Vil didnt just 'vpip'. He RAISED so so his vpip doesnt apply here. [/ QUOTE ] when you are talking about AF it does ... AF is a stat created by the "total" amount of actions taken. It's an indication of how agressive your opponent's 'general' post flop game is ... [/ QUOTE ] My point is I *think* his 3-pop range is the same as mine and everyone else who raises 10% of his hands and the 12% vpip has nothing to do with it thats all. He is simply agressive from the blinds ("AF is a stat created by the "total" amount of actions taken" yes... but its not a measure of the amount of actions taken. Agression factor is a relationship between calling and bet/raise/folding and this guy just isnt calling. That does not nessesarily mean he is not defending) [ QUOTE ] also, if this guy defended his blind at all by calling his vpip would be much higher withouth influencing the pfr [/ QUOTE ] this is true [ QUOTE ] Any information we can extract about hand ranges will derive from the pfr. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] so - i don't get your point ... we are getting killed then - an oop 3betting range by this guy is at the very least is KQs (and that's pushing it) [/ QUOTE ] [Jesus] -"you said it man" [/Jesus] But it is not the vpip of an ubernit that suggests this. His 3-pop range is the same as mine and everyone else who raises 10% of his hands and the 12% vpip has nothing to do with it thats all. He is simply agressive (as defined by AF) from the blinds. [ QUOTE ] The relative numbers of vpip-pfr -> agg factor will then just be a reflection of how well he plays (if converged). [ QUOTE ] agression has nothing to do with 'how well someone plays' [/ QUOTE ] Tell me what you think I meant with that statement and it will be easier to comment. [ QUOTE ] and this guy isn't a 'TAG' [/ QUOTE ] So for the record, how should 12/10/3 be characterized and how does his 3-jam range from the BB typically differ from an 18/9.5/2.5? |
|
|