Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-23-2007, 03:33 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default I predict no TRO, maybe a loss on Motion to Dismiss

Standing issues are fatal, in my view. Likelihood of success on the merits is near zero, as they need to show some LAWFUL activity is impacted, i.e. poker, and some US persons' rights are infringed. (It is highly unlikely that a Judge in New Jersey is going to enjoin the Federal government, especially in favor of an unlicensed, unregulated industry. An unlicensed, unregulated industry is an anathema to New Jersey, why the suit was brought there and not elsewhere in the 3d Ciruit is beyond my understanding. Even Nevada would have been better, as it is eager to get into the online gaming industry and has favorable 1st Amendment Federal judges.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.