Multitabling full ring question

[dynacraze]

There was a post about a guy here who said he used to 12 table in pokerroom 1-2 nl full ring and buying in the minimum... i think it was 10BBs and he said he made a good amoutn of money per hour with bonuses. I play 4 tables and play full stack. I used to middle stack and short stack full ring but i stopped b/c i had LESSER options for me to do. SS was either raise or fold and no post flop play which i disliked.

However, i want to be able to 12 table to accumulate more FPP per hour on stars. I have rakeback on tilt but still play there. However, whenever i play 8 tables with a full buy in, my head gets messed up b/c i have too many tables popping up. I know your best thing to do is play 4 tables but i just want to accumluate more FPP per hour like those 12 tabling players but those players are almost always NITS. From my previous posts, i bashed a lot about nits and i don't want to be one.

I rememeber i used to buy in for 50BB in ultimatebet and play 8 tables and that seemed a lot easier b/c my decisions were pretty easy to make. Most of the money went in on the turn usually but i stopped doing that b/c i play full ring now. However, i play terribly when 8 tabling full ring games but i like to play 8-12 tables.

I see A LOT of short stack players on stars 50NL who just hit and run and open new tables. They even hide themselves from search and probably they dont want others to notice.

What would you guys say is the best for me to play 12 tables? If i buy in full in every table, i have to play close to a nit and i really despise it. I hate shortstacking because i win so little even when i am ahead most of the time. Middle Stacking 12 tables seems to be easier for me full ring though some people say buying in for 50BB is the worst thing you can do.

I really want to play 12 tables. What do you suggests suggest? Note, i will not play limit holdem because that is the most frustrating game ever.

thanks.