Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 07-20-2007, 06:01 PM
DesertCat DesertCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pwned by A-Rod
Posts: 4,236
Default Re: Would a mutual fund manager to better with $1 billion or $100 mill

[ QUOTE ]
although i'm obviously being levelled, it was fund performance and not profits by the mutual fund manager

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry I couldn't resist Buffett's quote is referenced here.

You are right, and I'm shocked any professional would disagree with you. Essentially your coworker is arguing that giving an investor fewer investment opportunities doesn't affect performance. I.e. every fund has a lower threshold where investments are too illiquid to purchase or too small to impact fund performance. The bigger the fund the higher the threshold.

Maybe if you ran a computer driven fund that could afford to hold thousands of different stocks you might not have a lower threshold, but even in that case the bigger the fund the less you can buy of your most attractive investments, as a percentage of the fund.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.