Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 07-20-2007, 03:06 AM
ryanj247 ryanj247 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 458
Default Re: FT NL100 6Max - Analysis of getting pwned hard

[ QUOTE ]
BTW, given your history, most big hands, aka big pairs would check behind on this flop. when you attack his "weakness" on the flop, that actually looks very transparent after you call his 3bet. if you really had AA or KK, you'd be more inclined to keep him in the hand and induce bluffs and calls since he made his play look like a resteal. A check behind and a raise on the turn would probably be more effective.

[/ QUOTE ]

the thing is, even if it looks transparent, if he has no hand, what is he going to do about it?

you make an interesting point though. and while i'm not sure i would check AA or KK on this flop (or even any hand with a 9), that may be a leak on my part. i'll give this some thought. thanks.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.