a quick thought

[NickMPK]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

If I don't believe that land is capable of being "owned" by a person, should it be morally permissible for someone to force me off of a piece of land just because they claim to own it?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't believe land can be owned, by what calculus do you think you are entitled to stay?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't believe I am entitled to stay, but I do believe I am entitled to not be assaulted (as long as I am not assaulting anyone else).

[/ QUOTE ]

So you can own yourself (no assault otherwise), just not land? Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

What is ownership of land other than the right to assault me if I don't leave? What is taxation other than the right to assault me if I don't pay? Both constitute the theft of my freedom, right?