Nate's Theorem on the "Value Bluff"

[Nate tha\\\' Great]

[ QUOTE ]
im not sure, but are you insinuating we find a game-theory style which makes bets against every possible villain so that it is inexploitably +ev? if so, doesnt this ignore all reads which influence the decision?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've increasingly come to believe that a starting point for a poker strategy is to find a game theoretically sound strategy (rather than a "solid" strategy), and then to deviate from that as needed when you do have reads.