|
View Poll Results: Would you rather: | |||
Play in a serious game of dodgeball once every two months for the next 15 years. | 30 | 56.60% | |
Not. | 23 | 43.40% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure that this thread is meant to point out the futility of arguing with someone about anything after they've rejected the key evidence. Well done. Person A: Gravity exits. Person B: Not everywhere. Person A: What? Person B: Not on Pluto. Person A: What the hell are you talking about? Person B: Have you ever been to Pluto? I didn't think so! We have no idea if there's gravity there or not. Person A: Well, it still orbits the sun. Person B: You haven't even seen Pluto. Person A: Well, it's pretty obvious that we have gravity here. Person B: Who cares if we experience some local phenomenon? They don't have it in Antarctica. Person A: You gotta be [censored] me. Person B: How else do you explain penguins? Person A: What the hell do they have to do with gravity? Person B: That's exactly the question that I'm raising with the Pluto example! Person A: So you're trying to use penguins as another Pluto. I've seen penguins, and they obey gravity. Person B: Please provide me with a mechanism for showing why a penguin that you've seen has anything to do with a penguin in Antarctica. Person A: Ok. Now you're just being retarded. Why are you so smug? Person B: Why shouldn't I be? You're the one who can't back up your unscientific beliefs. [/ QUOTE ] so what you are saying is penguins are to blame for gravity? Or that pluto caused 9/11? |
|
|