#1
|
|||
|
|||
very thin value bet
I'm still trying to figure out how how this is a wise value bet by luclongley. I know these nosebleed stakes are way out of my league, but this bet at the end seems way too thin. Anyone have any ideas on his thinking process here?
Full Tilt Poker Game #2442955322: Table Halbert (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 0:03:41 ET - 2007/05/17 Seat 1: LucLongley ($230,184.40) Seat 2: David Benyamine ($142,266) LucLongley posts the small blind of $300 David Benyamine posts the big blind of $600 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** LucLongley raises to $1,800 David Benyamine calls $1,200 *** FLOP *** [Ah 3c 4c] David Benyamine checks LucLongley bets $3,000 David Benyamine raises to $10,800 LucLongley calls $7,800 *** TURN *** [Ah 3c 4c] [5s] David Benyamine has 15 seconds left to act David Benyamine bets $15,000 LucLongley calls $15,000 *** RIVER *** [Ah 3c 4c 5s] [7s] David Benyamine has 15 seconds left to act David Benyamine checks LucLongley has 15 seconds left to act LucLongley bets $43,800 David Benyamine calls $43,800 *** SHOW DOWN *** LucLongley shows [Ad 5c] (two pair, Aces and Fives) David Benyamine mucks LucLongley wins the pot ($142,799.50) with two pair, Aces and Fives *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $142,800 | Rake $0.50 Board: [Ah 3c 4c 5s 7s] Seat 1: LucLongley (small blind) collected ($142,799.50) Seat 2: David Benyamine (big blind) mucked |
|
|