"True M" vs. Harrington's M: Critical Flaws in Harrington's M Theory

[burningyen]

My hunch is that often the merit of maniac low M (or fast structure) play is due to the necessity of making a -EV play when the alternative plays are all even more -EV. So in advocating that we push with 62o and 20BBs in the CO given a certain structure, Snyder should be required to show that we cannot expect to find a better spot with that structure. While I think the tone of all of the back-and-forth among the authors is comical, I do think Snyder has raised some interesting questions.