Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:27 PM
HelixTrix HelixTrix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 82
Default Smoking vs. Risk of Ruin

I am a smoker who would like to quit. I've actually made a start on this by getting prescribed patches. Unfortunately so far I haven't managed to get on a 'run' with them. Anyway, I just had a train of thought where I found myself comparing giving up smoking to the risk of ruin model. If you have a set bankroll and a set level of play and you always withdraw whenever you go over your set bankroll level, then your RoR is 1, i.e. if you plan to play indefinitely using this system you are 100% likely to go broke at some point. Similarly, if you smoke indefinitely and live indefinitely, your risk of dying of a smoking-related disease is also 100%. HOWEVER, just by being born, your risk of dying SOMEHOW is already 100%. What justification is there for aggressively minimising certain methods of actualising your risk of ruin? Is this a utility value issue?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.