Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old 03-26-2007, 01:24 PM
Skallagrim Skallagrim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Live Free or Die State
Posts: 1,071
Default Re: What about a Dormant commerce clause argument, address that please

As my lunch hour is almost over, I decline to go researching for more cases. The porn cases previously cited already demonstrate the point you seem to miss: commerce that occurs interstate can ONLY be regulated by the Federal Government. You are completely wrong, as I recall from 1st year law school, to state that "it is fine for the Federal government to explicitly defer an issue to state regulation from a DCC perspective" if the issue is an issue of interstate commerce.

If you think I am wrong, cite one case please that supports the above quote.

Or, as a refresher course on the commerce clause, google "interstate wine sales" and you will find a recent case in which the US Supreme Court overturned state laws that required out of state wine shippers to obtain some sort of in-state license or similar thing.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.