The Injustice of Rigged Juries: It's Routine

[AngusThermopyle]

What bias?

The question the jury decides is:
Did the defendant break law X.

The judge removes prospective juror Y who says:
I refuse to convict anyone for breaking law X, even if is proven that he broke law X.

If the judge allows prospective juror Y to sit, what is the outcome?

What if a judge allowed a juror to sit who had said:
I will vote to convict, no matter what the evidence is.

Also, as one jurist noted:

"The irony is that, as a practical matter, a jury has the power to nullify an anti-nullification instruction."